Talk:Buildings

From Crusader Kings II Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Buildings Split[edit]

I'm moving over the buildings into the appropriate holdings pages. I felt that it is more useful to split them up, and have lists of what can be built in each holding, rather than putting them all together on one page. That's the idea, anyways; nothing will be deleted from here before all the other pages are up.

OK, seems reasonable. Remember to sign when you write in Talk (four ~ in a row). Edit: Oh and in that case, redirect Buildings to Holdings once you're done. ~ Meneth (talk) 23:01, 6 July 2012 (CEST)
Will do, on all parts. Benandorf (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2012 (CEST)
I'd recommend using headers to separate each building type. Perhaps write a sentence about each as well? ~ Meneth (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2012 (CEST)
Oh and for any table where you don't actually use the "Notes" column, there's no need to include it. ~ Meneth (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2012 (CEST)
I'll work on cleaning both of those up, both on castles and on cities. Benandorf (talk) 19:45, 7 July 2012 (CEST)

Buildings Analytics[edit]

Hey, I've been tracking a lot of buildings data in Excel and thought it would be useful to share it on a Wiki. This is a rough prototype:

Name
Holding
Cost
Build Time
Light Infantry
Heavy Infantry
Archers
Pikemen
Light Cavalry
Heavy Cavalry
Horse Archers
Galleys
Skirmish Attack
Melee Attack
Pursue Attack
Skirmish Defense
Melee Defense
Pursue Defense
Morale
Total Attack
per Cost
Total Defense
per Cost
Morale
per Cost
Militia Barracks 1 Castle 100 1 80 10 240 250 260 250 2.5
Militia Barracks 2 Castle 120 1.5 20 90 760 150 240 150 1.3
Militia Barracks 3 Castle 300 3 30 120 1020 210 330 210 0.7
Barracks 1 Castle 100 1 30 15 20 260 60 240 2.4
Barracks 2 Castle 120 1.5 40 15 20 320 80 290 2.4
Barracks 3 Castle 200 2 45 20 30 370 90 345 1.7
Barracks 4 Castle 300 3 50 25 30 430 110 400 1.3
Barracks 5 Castle 400 6 60 25 40 490 130 450 1.1
Barracks 6 Castle 500 6 65 30 40 540 140 550 1.0

It gets more into evaluation of each building's worth. I'm wondering where a good place to put this would be. It seems like this page is being torn down (a pity). Should I create a separate article, and if so, any suggestions on a name? iron0037 (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2012 (EDT)

I suppose you could make one named Building Analytics or something like that. If you're doing it for all 3 holding types, one page per holding would probably be best. ~ Meneth (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2012 (CEST)